alexandral: (Default)
[personal profile] alexandral
This is just a rant, but I just can’t curb my feelings. **

The rant stems form the watching ”Our mutual friend” - very well-made adaptation, lovely actors, settings, and altogether great 8 hours of watching.. Truly, the dramatization was really good!

Nonetheless, I just must say that I don’t like Dickens. I feel very weird saying it. His first book I have read was “Oliver Twist” . It was saccharine, sentimental and had little boys dying. Was a string-pulling sort of book for me. I have also read “Nickolas Nickelby” and this book made the same impression – saccharine plus dying. I found this book and “David Kopperfield” also very long and **gasp** boring. I haven’t finished “David Copperfield”. If I don’t like the book, I usually quickly look at the ending to get to know what happened and leave it. I never can read a book I am not interested in **Feels very guilty**

I have watched few TV series made from the Dickens books, but it is not really fare to make an impression about the book writer from the series..

I am torn and wrong, but I don’t like:

1. There seem to be same types of characters in every book : Poor but saint girl, Old childless couple of saints, dying boy, Scheming underworld characters…
2. The stores are far-fetched – lost children, false identities, inheritances..
3. There is always somebody dying FOR A VERY LONG PEROID of book-time from consumption, or wounds..
4. Too much saccharine
5. Too long


UPDATE This all said, [livejournal.com profile] dangermousie just reminded me (thank you!!) that The Pickwick Papers Is Dickens's book too. AND - I ABSOLUTELY ADORE THE PICKWICK PAPERS, but again, this book is a little different from the rest ;)

I am dissatisfied with myself , I AM A BAD-TASTED person who doesn’t appreciate one of the greatest English writers O WOE! WHAT IS WRONG WITH ME??????????

Date: 2006-01-30 10:00 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] dangermousie.livejournal.com
P.S. Re: length. Length is one of the things I love about Dickens and other Victorian authors, it allows me to absorb into his world. I think pace might be more of a problem if you don't like the leisurely way he tells his story.

And as to coincidence, it's obviously a literary contrivance to a degree but society used to be much smaller back then.

The best thing about Dickens never comes across in adaptations actually, because IMO it's his gorgeous use of language. He is one of the few authors with whom I can actually just open a book randomly and read a few sentences slowly and just fall in love with them.

Sorry for the length, but Dickens is one of my faves.

Date: 2006-01-30 10:19 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] alexandral.livejournal.com
Thank you! Because i have this easy-persuaded mind, i feel like giving "Our Mutual Friend" a try too (i loved Eugene Wrayburn **sigh**. You know , i thought that he is going to die, and definitely would have never forgiven it to Dickens).

The best thing about Dickens never comes across in adaptations actually, because IMO it's his gorgeous use of language

This is very true!. His wit and descriptions are amazing! **has to be fare**

Profile

alexandral: (Default)
alexandral

January 2012

S M T W T F S
1234 56 7
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031    

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Aug. 3rd, 2025 08:25 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios