Hidden (Caché)
May. 11th, 2007 05:38 pmI watched Michael Haneke's "Hidden" ("Cache") this week. It was a curious, very detached emotionally film. I liked the way it was made - almost all in the clinically white and black colours and without any background music. There was a small minus because the subtitles were also white and sometimes this made them hard to see.

Story in short: One day a middle aged, middle-class French couple George (Daniel Auteuil) and Anne (Juliette Binoche) Laurent receives an anonymous video tape which contains the footage of the surveillance of their life. Later they start receiving bizarre and scary-looking drawings of a child bleeding. As we follow the story that the anonymous tapes tell us we discover some things from Georges Laurent's past that he wants to stay hidden. Long time ago George's parents wanted to adopt an Algerian orphan called Majid but George didn't like the boy and by telling lies and fabricating stories he stopped his parents from adopting.
The tapes lead George to meet Madjit (who is living in the very poor conditions and whom George suspects to be the anonymous sender) for the first time in the many years and after some interaction between the two of them Madjit commits suicide in the front of George.
"Cache" was undeniably a film about racism. Not about the ignorant racism of someone with low intelligence and narrow vision, but about the racism of people who pride themselves to be highly-educated, smart and free from any prejudices. I would call this type unconscious racism. George will probably deny that he is racist but he so obviously is. Somewhere in the first 15 minutes of the film there is a revealing scene when George is having a fight with an African man on a bike. George doesn't make any racist remarks but the way this scene is made make you think that he doesn't like the African guy because he IS African.
I thought that the roots of George's racism lie in his childhood and the story with Madjit. Young George didn't like the fact that he probably would have to share his parents with this alien boy. He made this alien boy to disappear but because this left him with the huge feeling of guilt George and made him dislike "alien" people .
There are few questions of "What?" in this film for me. I really would like to discuss this with you if you seen the film..
First, I don't understand why Madjit killed himself. This can be understandable if Madjit was the tape sender and if the whole thing was his elaborate plan. Only I don't think Madjit was sending the tapes.. Why anyone would commit a suicide in the front of his arch-enemy?
Second, Who did send the tapes? There is a clue at the end of the film when during the titles rolling we see George's son and Madjit's son talking together. Did they conceive it together? This doesn't make sense to me because it seems that Madjit's son honestly loved his father.. I don't think it is Madjit himself neither, he just didin't seem to be that type of man. Madjit seems to be peace-loving and subdued. My theory (a wild one) is that George was sending the tapes himself, that he was driven by his bottled-up feeling of guilt and hate against Madjit.

Story in short: One day a middle aged, middle-class French couple George (Daniel Auteuil) and Anne (Juliette Binoche) Laurent receives an anonymous video tape which contains the footage of the surveillance of their life. Later they start receiving bizarre and scary-looking drawings of a child bleeding. As we follow the story that the anonymous tapes tell us we discover some things from Georges Laurent's past that he wants to stay hidden. Long time ago George's parents wanted to adopt an Algerian orphan called Majid but George didn't like the boy and by telling lies and fabricating stories he stopped his parents from adopting.
The tapes lead George to meet Madjit (who is living in the very poor conditions and whom George suspects to be the anonymous sender) for the first time in the many years and after some interaction between the two of them Madjit commits suicide in the front of George.
"Cache" was undeniably a film about racism. Not about the ignorant racism of someone with low intelligence and narrow vision, but about the racism of people who pride themselves to be highly-educated, smart and free from any prejudices. I would call this type unconscious racism. George will probably deny that he is racist but he so obviously is. Somewhere in the first 15 minutes of the film there is a revealing scene when George is having a fight with an African man on a bike. George doesn't make any racist remarks but the way this scene is made make you think that he doesn't like the African guy because he IS African.
I thought that the roots of George's racism lie in his childhood and the story with Madjit. Young George didn't like the fact that he probably would have to share his parents with this alien boy. He made this alien boy to disappear but because this left him with the huge feeling of guilt George and made him dislike "alien" people .
There are few questions of "What?" in this film for me. I really would like to discuss this with you if you seen the film..
First, I don't understand why Madjit killed himself. This can be understandable if Madjit was the tape sender and if the whole thing was his elaborate plan. Only I don't think Madjit was sending the tapes.. Why anyone would commit a suicide in the front of his arch-enemy?
Second, Who did send the tapes? There is a clue at the end of the film when during the titles rolling we see George's son and Madjit's son talking together. Did they conceive it together? This doesn't make sense to me because it seems that Madjit's son honestly loved his father.. I don't think it is Madjit himself neither, he just didin't seem to be that type of man. Madjit seems to be peace-loving and subdued. My theory (a wild one) is that George was sending the tapes himself, that he was driven by his bottled-up feeling of guilt and hate against Madjit.
no subject
Date: 2007-05-11 07:37 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-05-12 10:36 am (UTC)I hope you and your Mum will like it!
no subject
Date: 2007-05-11 08:52 pm (UTC)In addition, here's what I pieced together from what I remember and what I wrote during another comment exchange last year.
"The 'big' picture is pretty straightforward, be it France and Algeria or the West (USA+Europe) and the Middle East/Third World.
But what made me angry and I had difficulties with were the behaviour of the characters of Auteuil and Binoche. It just didn't make sense to me how Auteuil blamed the guy for the video taping. Of course, one can argue that that was part of the point, but I still didn't like it.
I also have difficulties in general with slightly hysterical characters like Binoche's. Of course, she's a mother and the communication between the couple is more than lacking but I still didn't like it. I also had difficulties with the behaviour of the child but I can't remember what it was exactly. I think it also seemed very unmotivated, the way he ran away and came back."
While I was suspecting it, I didn't recognise it myself during the final scene is that the two boys met and that they seemed to be relatively acquainted. I'm not sure if somebody mentioned that they can be seen at another point together during the movie (that's why I said earlier that I want/have to watch the movie again one day.
Personally, I originally didn't care for who sent/made the tapes since I assumed it is only a 'catalyst' and it's not really important. But in light of the final scene most people seem to think that they were made by Madjit's son. Maybe with the help of the other kid.
About the question why Madjit killed himself, I don't know. If he was only a 'symbol' then maybe to draw attention to his situation. But I don't really remember if that would make any sense. As I mentioned I didn't particularly like the movie. :)
no subject
Date: 2007-05-12 11:00 am (UTC)But what made me angry and I had difficulties with were the behaviour of the characters of Auteuil and Binoche. It just didn't make sense to me how Auteuil blamed the guy for the video taping. Of course, one can argue that that was part of the point, but I still didn't like it.
What didn't you like? Did you think that George's acting this way was not realistic? That he was too tense? This didn't worry me, but I thought that George was sending the tapes himself and his tension would have been very natural. My biggest argument for George's sending the tape is that story in the past when he told elaborate lies to his parents to get rid of Madjit. This just seems to be such a precedent. Another thing was that after Madjit's death Geoge finally relaxed and went to sleep as if he knew that the tapes would not be coming anymore..
I also have difficulties in general with slightly hysterical characters like Binoche's.
This didn't worry me neither. I thought that their family situation was very dysfunctional to start with and that everyone was very much hysterical and shouting at each other even before the tapes started..
I also had difficulties with the behaviour of the child but I can't remember what it was exactly. I think it also seemed very unmotivated, the way he ran away and came back."
I did have some questions about this but I thought all this was explained in his conversation with his mother that took place straight afterwards. The boy blamed his mother for her "cuddling" with their family friend in the café. The boy didn't say that he knew about it explicitly but he blamed the mother that she is always with this guy, etc. etc.. I think it was either the boy received the tape with his mother/family friend quite inappropriate cuddling in the café or he made the tapes himself..
Personally, I originally didn't care for who sent/made the tapes since I assumed it is only a 'catalyst' and it's not really important.
I think this is the logical freak in me – I am trying to rationalize everything.
About the question why Madjit killed himself, I don't know. If he was only a 'symbol' then maybe to draw attention to his situation. But I don't really remember if that would make any sense. As I mentioned I didn't particularly like the movie. :)
I think this is what bothers me the most. I like your explanation about it being a symbol but I find a difficulty here, I like it being psychologically explainable too.
no subject
Date: 2007-05-13 01:03 pm (UTC)I wouldn't necessarily describe myself as a logic freak too (especially not when it comes to movies like this) but the blaming of Majid by George seemed to me very baseless. Without even a hint of logic evidence. If there's a hint then Goerge can start to imagine things and get more and more convinced that Majid is the one. But without it it's just irrational.
As I said before, maybe that's just what Haneke intended because he wanted to show such baseless racism but I still don't like it and it's very hard for me to take such a behaviour seriously. It also fails to help me understand things because I see it as totally irrational and illogical.
However, if George indeed did send the tapes himself then it would make more sense since it would confirm that he is a really sick character.
no subject
Date: 2007-05-13 10:42 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-05-12 10:40 pm (UTC)And this is may be partly why I liked this film - I really love Tarkovsky!
no subject
Date: 2007-05-13 01:09 pm (UTC)However, I don't remember those two as being as cold and distanced as Caché.
no subject
Date: 2007-05-13 10:46 pm (UTC)Stalker was my favourite film when I was a teenager (it is an adaptation of one of my favorite books, very strange adaptation admittedly). I remember having that "OMPH! This is so wonderful!" feeling when I saw Solaris for the first time.
no subject
Date: 2007-05-14 07:00 am (UTC)That must've been 20 years ago. Almost exactly, since I remember it was during my time of military service. Even though I knew a little bit about what to expect (being described as some kind of Russian equivalent to 2001) I don't think I was well prepared for the movie back then. It would probably be very different if I saw it again today.
I saw it again partly on TV not too long ago because I wanted to compare it to the new version (of which I own the DVD) but I wasn't really in the mood for it so that's something I still want to do one day.
no subject
Date: 2007-05-14 08:49 pm (UTC)I take it you didn't like it. :D I must say that when I re-watched "Stalker" recently I felt that the pace is quite slow. I didn't notice this in the past - it just seemed to be quite normal. I am getting spoiled by Hollywood pace nowdays. It is not that there is anything wrong with the fast pace but there is definite beauty in the different way of developing of the story when you must just "swim" in it. (sorry for digression).
no subject
Date: 2007-05-15 09:56 pm (UTC)The pace of movies certainly has chanced in recent years thanks to the MTV-video-clip style that has become a big influence. Thankfully, I'm still able to enjoy fast as well as slow movie. :)
no subject
Date: 2007-05-15 10:27 pm (UTC)I saw "Solaris" for the first time at school (the last year, I think). I used to live in the boarding school at that time (not because my parents had to send me away but because this was a special school for children who were good at Math and it wasn't in our city. Hee! I used to be good at math.) This school was very good and thinking back I think my love for films was developed there. We had a film club every week where they used to show us good movies of the day with some explanation before and some of those were not even in general release. I was totally blown away by "Solaris", it is probably one of the movies I remember well from that period.
Hmm. I am sorry I am reminiscing!!!
no subject
Date: 2007-05-16 06:12 pm (UTC)The amount of time you have to serve has been steadily reduced. It started with 18 months, it was 15 months when I served and I believe it's less than a year by now.
I bet you're still good at math. :D
Any other movies that made a big impression on you from that time at the film club?
"sorry for digression" ... "sorry I am reminiscing"
Of course it is your journal and you can apologise as much as you want. But it would be nice if you didn't do so, since in my view digressing and reminiscing are some of the nice parts of having conversations like that. :)
And if you continue to do so I would have to do the same since I did the same things too. :)
And most excellent icon! I haven't read your 'Hot Fuzz' entry yet since it will be another month until the movie comes out here. Woe!
no subject
Date: 2007-05-18 09:30 am (UTC)I remember seeing "Autumn Sonata" at that time.. One day I must re-watch this.
I am so glad you like the icon! I am so happy everyone seems to like "Hot Fuzz" (and I hope you will like it too. :D)
no subject
Date: 2007-05-18 08:36 pm (UTC)I haven't seen too many movies from Bergman. Maybe I would give them a chance if they were shown again here on TV (which hasn't been the case for quite some time). But I can understand how they might leave an impression on you. :)
I think I take that homage to Leon 'Hot Fuzz' icon just to make sure I don't forget. :)
no subject
Date: 2007-05-19 07:52 pm (UTC)I am glad you like the icon. :D Really i am :D
no subject
Date: 2007-05-11 11:14 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-05-12 11:01 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-05-13 04:59 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-05-13 10:31 am (UTC)