Yes, and some others too. Also as it seems from the marks - he wanted to do 4-3-2 jump (if he would have done it, he would have won), but he only managed 4-3 (and both were a bit wobbly to my eyes). And then it was pure MATH - he just didn't do as many other high-value elements as Lysacek.
This to say - I wasn't impressed by anyone there, Lysacek is one of the champions who is a champion just because no-one is better, not because he himself is excellent.
no subject
Date: 2010-02-21 08:54 pm (UTC)This to say - I wasn't impressed by anyone there, Lysacek is one of the champions who is a champion just because no-one is better, not because he himself is excellent.