Date: 2011-09-06 01:43 pm (UTC)
Yes, this is what bothers me too. And there was no need for adding the "fatal mistake" storyline in Jon's case, I think. I would have really preferred if the Night's Watch just decided to rebel because of Jon's inviting the wildlings in. Jon could have been injured all the same, but this just would have been different.

On the side note, if it was Brandon, not Ned, some things that Barristan did would have made more sense. I think it is semi-canon (or canon) that Barristan was there (and did nothing) when Ned's father and brother were murdered by Arys. It would have made more sense if Barristan hated Brandon (and his father because her might have been involved in not letting Brandon marry Ashara).
This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

Profile

alexandral: (Default)
alexandral

January 2012

S M T W T F S
1234 56 7
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031    

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Aug. 3rd, 2025 10:15 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios