alexandral (
alexandral) wrote2008-04-23 10:53 pm
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Entry tags:
Shameless post of pictures of Lee-love
I am busy at work with the Epic Project and another Project of Hassle and Overtime into helping with which I agreed without appropriate thinking. I haven't watched anything particular exciting but Battlestar Galactica episode 4.03. It was GREAT and I loved it as much as the other two of this season.
Without getting into spoilers I just want to say - Lee! I love Lee! I wish to know whose winning idea it was to make him wear the stripy suit of Democracy!












Without getting into spoilers I just want to say - Lee! I love Lee! I wish to know whose winning idea it was to make him wear the stripy suit of Democracy!












no subject
*SIIIIGGGGHHHH*.......
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
Thanks so much for this!
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
(no subject)
no subject
HUZZAH.
Thank goodness for intergalactic tailors, wherever they may be...and thank you again for lovely icons of Lee in it!
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
*pets the pretty pictures*
(no subject)
no subject
I was thinking his suit was kind of gangster. Perhaps the stripes aren't wide enough though. :)
Did you see this? TV's Sexiest Stars (http://tvg.a.mms.mavenapps.net/mms/rt/1/site/tvg-playeraccount-pub01-live/current/launch.html?maven_playerId=embeddedplayer&maven_referralObject=ed776821-dee8-4501-bf47-7459e054743e&maven_tvgolObjectId=286813)
(no subject)
no subject
(no subject)
no subject
Ya know, I've seen a lot of people lament the loss of Pilot!Lee and the uniform of which I would love to reply, "Are you fraking crazy?!" One of the best ideas EVER on the show was to put Jamie in a suit. :) Plus, your pic spam also proves how awesome Jamie is when it comes to facial expressions.
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
(Came via
(no subject)
Here from QoT's lj.
All hail the unknown tailors.
Re: Here from QoT's lj.
Re: Here from QoT's lj.
no subject
(no subject)